Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.

Use when drafting AAAI rebuttals under the single short author-response limit, no-URL rule, no-new-results guidance, AI-review handling, and two-phase review process.

Use when targeting AAAI Conference on Human Computation and Crowdsourcing (HCOMP) or deciding whether a computer-science manuscript fits this venue. Encodes conference fit, framing, evidence bar, submission-cycle checks, rebuttal posture, and desk-reject risks for human computation.

Use when strengthening an AAAI paper's reproducibility checklist, experimental traceability, seed reporting, compute disclosure, dataset access, code/data readiness, and evidence map.

Use when explaining or planning around AAAI's two-phase review process, Phase 1 rejection risk, Phase 2 additional reviews, AI-assisted review pilot, author feedback, SPC/AC discussion, and final decisions.

Use when deciding whether a project is a strong AAAI submission, should be reframed for AAAI, or should be routed to IJCAI, NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, AISTATS, UAI, ACL, CVPR, KDD, CHI, or another venue.

Use when planning an AAAI project timeline from topic selection through abstract, OpenReview submission, two-phase review, rebuttal, decision, camera-ready, registration, presentation, and public artifact release.

Use when revising an AAAI manuscript for broad AI audience fit, concise contribution claims, two-column readability, reproducibility-checklist alignment, and policy-aware AI-system claims.